Safeguard your Zopa loans

Peer-to-peer pioneer Zopa has evolved again, with the company introducing ‘Safeguard’, a new and arguably safer way to lend money. Up to now Zopa has worked by matching individual lenders and borrowers in a marketplace. You set the interest rate you’ll accept on your loans, and Zopa pairs your savings up with borrowers

The main benefit of lending via Zopa has been higher rates than you’d get with a bank. Some people also liked the idea of lending direct to individuals, and cutting out those “greedy” financial institutions. Savers can earn around 5 percent annually after charges for lending money through Zopa for up to 5 years, compared with around 2-3 percent for fixed-term savings held at banks

The downside of Zopa was if a loan soured and your smiling borrower turned into a feckless defaulter, then you lost most or all of the money that you’d lent them

The default option

Your main protection against default has hitherto been Zopa’s usually excellent credit checking, which has kept bad debt well below the predicted levels. The site has a default rate of less than 1 percent. In addition, you can spread your money between very many borrowers – perhaps lending as little as £10 to any one individual – in order to reduce the impact of any single borrower doing a runner

With a fairly large pot of money and typical luck, you could enjoy a healthy average annual return, after deducting fees and bad debts

BUT money lent with Zopa is not guaranteed by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, and defaults can and do happen, with cash-sapping results. And just to add insult to injury, the way that Zopa interest is taxed, you’re unable to set these bad loans off against your taxable interest income. So bad debts didn’t even give you the small mercy of a slightly lower tax bill for your troubles

Bailing out your DIY bank

The new ‘Safeguard’ option radically changes this traditional Zopa model. First and foremost, Zopa claims you will be reimbursed if any of your loans go sour. This will be done via a special fund held in trust for the sole purpose of returning money owed to savers if their borrowers default. At a stroke, the bad debt problem largely goes away (at least so long as the compensation fund isn’t overwhelmed by bad loans due to some sort of unlikely systemic failure)

The second big change with Safeguard is that if you lend money via the new system, you no longer set a rate you’ll accept for your money. Instead, all the money goes into the one Safeguard pot that Zopa bundles up to create loans for new borrowers. For some reason this Safeguard money has been prioritised by Zopa for lending, too, so you should see it lent out very quickly

The interest rate you get for each microloan via Safeguard is determined by a changing tracker rate. Zopa says it will adjust this rate by looking at:

- the rates being set in its own market

- the rates competitors charge for loans

- average savings rates

You’ll probably get different rates across the micro-loans you parcel out via Safeguard. Overall though, your average rate should be in line with what Zopa is predicting – which is currently 5.1% for shorter term loans

The advantage should be that Zopa will be able to fulfil loans more quickly, especially larger loans. This may enable Zopa to feature more prominently on financial comparison tables for a wider range of loan bands, and so drive more borrowers to the Zopa site

Currently Zopa has a problem where it seems to have a lot of savers but perhaps too few borrowers, considering how competitive it should be given the cheaper loans it usually offers

Something for nothing?

Sadly not. The immediate disadvantage of using Safeguard is you no longer have any control over the rate you get

In addition it seems likely that the rates on offer via Safeguard will be lower than might have been available in the usual Zopa market for two reasons:

- some of your return goes to fund Safeguard’s reimbursement war chest

- bank interest rates are lower than you’ve been able to get via Zopa, and the Safeguard tracker rate will follow them down


On the face of it, the introduction of Safeguard is good news from Zopa. It’s always annoying when disproportionate bad luck means an overall poor result, so spreading bad debt across an entire constituency of savers – just as you do when you put money into a normal bank – will be welcomed by all but the most masochistic.

However, this move also makes Zopa more like a standard bank – only without the nailed-on guarantee on your savings from the FSCS (Cyprus-style deposit raids notwithstanding!)

Safeguard represents more of a fire-and-forget approach to lending money. If it becomes the usual way to lend with Zopa, then this will hit those who’ve enjoyed ‘gaming’ Zopa for an extra 1-2% in interest. It will probably also reduce the community feel over time

Safety first at Zopa?

It’s anyone’s guess, but Safeguard is likely to eventually become the main method of lending money via Zopa. Having any bad debts repaid will be just too attractive for most people to resist, even if theoretically they might have done slightly better taking the odd hit but getting higher rates to compensate

Zopa has been getting simpler and simpler for years. It scrapped its high-risk ‘C’ marketplace and its ‘Y market’ that provided loans to young people, for instance, and it reduced the term options for lenders to “shorter” and “longer”, in place of specific terms measured in years

Other ‘good’ changes include the ‘Rapid Return’ facility that now enables you to get much of your savings money out at short notice if needed, albeit for a charge. Rapid Return partially addressed the imbalance whereby borrowers could repay early, but lenders had to remain locked into their loans.

The new Safeguard product will also prove popular with all but the hardcore, but it will probably suck more savings into the system, and it will likely bring down rates for those borrowers who find their way to Zopa, too

But arguably Zopa’s problem is one of insufficient scale, which means any emerging imbalances have tended to be addressed by shifts in its operating model. In theory, its original market-driven rate-setting system should have produced the perfect equilibrium between risk and reward

But with Safeguard’s tracker rates partly set by competitors and Safeguard savers having to take what they’re given by way of return, the lofty ideals of the early peer-to-peer enthusiasts are arguablly further away than ever

For all the ins-and-outs about Safeguard, visit the Zopa website


Did you enjoy this post?

If so, would you please consider sharing it with the world

Leave a Reply

Default User

Your Name

May 02, 2013

* Name, Email, and Comment are Required